Carter v. Hill
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
BANKS, J.
(Parsons, J., dissenting.)
This is an income tax case and is before ns on agreed facts. The primary question involved is whether Helen Strong Carter, referred to as the taxpayer, was under the agreed facts required by our income tax statute to pay a tax during the taxation period of 1926 on her income derived from certain holdings owned by her but actually and physically located in the State of New York. The income upon which the Territory claims the taxpayer was legally bound to pay the statutory tax was derived as dividends on shares of stock of the Eastman…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Blackstone v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Blodgett v. SilbermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- New Orleans v. StempelSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Case of the State Tax on Foreign-Held Bonds. Railroad Company v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re the Tax Appeal of Grayco Land Escrow, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- Hill v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- In Re the Tax Appeals of McCormacHawaii Supreme Court · 1982