Legal Opinion · Dissent

Carter v. Hill

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1930No. 1830Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OF

PARSONS, J.

I respectfully dissent. In my opinion the legislature of the Territory not only “has the power to tax the income of residents received from all sources,” as conceded by counsel for the taxpayer, but, contrary to counsel’s claim, it lias exercised that power in the enactment of section 1388, R. L. 1925.

The majority withholds, as unnecessary in the premises, any expression of opinion as to whether counsel’s concession of power above referred to is proper or improper. The theory of this dissent requires a preliminary statement of views and supporting citations…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. DeGanay v. LedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Maguire v. TrefrySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Maguire v. Tax CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. State ex rel. Sallie F. Moon Co. v. Wisconsin Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API