Legal Opinion

People v. Pozzi

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1928No. Docket No. 1005PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HART, J...

The defendant, by information filed in

the superior court in and for the county of Mendocino, was charged in three different counts with maintaining a common nuisance on three different designated occasions, in that, as the information charges, he wilfully and unlawfully did, on the first day of April, 1927 (first count), on the third day of May, 1927 (second count), and on the twenty-first clay of May, 1927 (third count), maintain “a place, in the city of Port Bragg, Mendocino county, state of California, where intoxicating liquor, to-wit: whiskey and jackass brandy, was kept, sold…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. FerdinandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. People v. KollerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. People v. WeirCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. PuppiloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. People v. GranilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. People v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. People v. CooperAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API