Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Puppilo

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 13, 1929No. Docket No. 1833PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAHN, J., pro tem.

The defendant, Mike Puppilo, was charged in an information filed by the district attorney of Los Angeles County, in each of two counts with a violation of section 2 of the so-called “Gun Law,” being an act of the legislature adopted in 1923 (Act 1970, p. 662, Deering’s Gen. Laws 1923). The portion of the section material to our discussion reads as follows:

“On and after the date upon which this act takes effect no unnaturalized, foreign born person . . . shall own or have in his possession or under his custody or control any pistol, revolver or other firearm capable of being…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. FolletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. People v. RabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. People v. DegnenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. State v. BenhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1829
  5. People v. WillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. AmickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. People v. LagomarsinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. People v. CrawfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API