Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 3, 1953No. 6608PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate or correct a sentence of imprisonment. Appellant complains of the sentence because under a plea of guilty entered to several counts of an indictment the court imposed a sentence longer than might have been imposed under any one of the counts but less than the aggregate of the sentences that might have been imposed under all of them. This was unquestionably proper. Neely v. United States, 4 Cir., 2 F.2d 849. While it is ordinarily desirable that sentence be imposed under each count of an indictment on which a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Neely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
  2. Hamilton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Scott v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Isaac Henry Call v. United States of America, Tal Joe Pearson v. United States of America, (Two Cases). Squire Wiles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
  3. Horace Chandler Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  4. Vandegrift v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  5. Bistram v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API