Legal Opinion

Vandegrift v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 23, 1961No. [No. 323, September Term, 1960.]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorney, J.

The primary question on this appeal is whether the general sentence imposed by the trial court (in lieu of separate sentences on the several counts of an information) was proper.

On July 9, 1959, Richard Allen Vandegrift (the defendant) was charged with a series of breakings and larcenies in a ten-count information, the first of which—charging the defendant with larceny to the value of $100 or more — was stricken on the motion of the State’s Attorney. The second count charged the defendant with stealing the goods of John E. Slouick, Jr., of a value of less than $100; the third count charged a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  2. Commonwealth v. HullMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Neely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
  4. Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  5. Scott v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dorfman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. Tender v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Gatewood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Chittum v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Fabian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API