Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 11, 1952No. 6406_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a motion to allow an appeal to be prosecuted in forma pauperis from an order denying a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to set aside a judgment and sentence entered upon a plea of guilty to an indictment charging appellant with fraudulent use of the mails. Defendant was convicted under the indictment and sentenced to a term in prison. Subsequently the trial judge set aside the verdict and judgment and ordered a new trial in the case. A competent attorney was assigned to defend appellant who went into the case thoroughly and advised appellant to plead guilty to three of the counts of the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
  2. Bistram v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API