Dozier v. Northrop
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Conn Linn, Judge. Action by Mary Sells Northrop against. William Z. Dozier to rescind contract and for money judgment. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.
The defendant in error filed her petition in the district court of Tulsa county, Olda., alleging, in substance, that plaintiff in error, during the year 1915, falsely and fraudulently represented that he was the owner of certain mining inop-erty, that the i>roperty had cost him $24,000, and offered to let the plaintiff in “on the ground floor on the purchase of said property” by selling to plaintiff a one-half interest in said property for $12,000; that these representations wore false and known to the defendant to be false at the time he made them; that plaintiff relied on such false and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Menefee v. OxnamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Cooper v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Bergeron v. MilesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Henry v. CollierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Chisum v. HugginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Beatrice Creamery Co. v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Davis v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Steiner v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Conard v. DarnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Rodriguez v. BulottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932