Legal Opinion

Chisum v. Huggins

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 11, 1916No. 6067PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from District Court, Pottawatomie County; Charles B. Wilson, Jr., Judge. Action by W. C. Chisum, against Ellen Huggins and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBBERTS, C.

This action was commenced in the district court of Pottawatomie county on the 10th day of July, 1911, by W. C. Chisum against Ellen Huggins and T. W. Smith, to recover judgment upon a promissory note signed by said parties, and for foreclosure of mortgage on certain real estate in the city of Shawnee, executed by the defendant Huggins. The defendant Smith was surety' on the note. The petition is the- usual pleading for such proceeding. The parties herein will be designated “plaintiff” and' “defendants,” the same as below.

The defendants answered by general denial of all…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fargo Gas & Coke Co. v. Fargo Gas & Electric Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Strand v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  3. Prescott v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Wickham v. GrantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  5. Gilpin v. Netograph MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Beavers v. Lamplighters Realty, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Caples v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Byers v. BrisleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Myler v. Fidelity Mut. Life Ins. Co. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Kansas Municipal Gas Agency v. Vesta Energy Co., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API