Legal Opinion
In Re Richard N. Bennett
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 28, 1985No. Appeal 84-778PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (Board), rejecting claims 24-39 of reissue patent application Serial No. 036,745 of Richard N. Bennett under 35 U.S.C. § 251, on the ground that a broadening reissue application that was filed within two years of the patent’s issue date but was erroneously filed by the as-signee could not be corrected by a declaration of the inventor filed more than two *525years after the patent’s issue date. We reverse.
Background
The application at bar was filed on May 7, 1979…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- John H. Coleman v. Martin B. DinesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Ball Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In re RogoffCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- A. F. Stoddard & Company, Ltd. v. C. Marshall Dann, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Application of Henri-Georges DollCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
3Cited by14 opinions
- Quantum Corporation v. Rodime, PlcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Ajinomoto Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- 3M Co. v. Avery Dennison Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- In Re Elmar W. Weiler and Richard L. MansellCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Tillotson, Ltd. v. Walbro CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.