Legal Opinion
3M Co. v. Avery Dennison Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 26, 2012No. 2011-1339PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
3M Company (“3M”) appeals from the district court’s dismissal of its declaratory judgment action against Avery Dennison Corporation (“Avery”) for lack of a case or controversy. See 3M Co. v. Avery Dennison Corp., No. 0:10-CV-3849, 2011 WL 1193382 (D.Minn. Mar. 29, 2011) (“DJ Op.”). Because we hold that the district court erred in determining that it would not have jurisdiction under the facts as alleged by 3M, and the district court did not resolve the parties’ factual disputes necessary to determine if jurisdiction was proper, we vacate the district court’s judgment and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Impossible Foods Inc. v. Impossible X LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Merus N.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Mymail, Ltd. v. Oovoo, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Danisco U.S. Inc. v. Novozymes A/SCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.