Legal Opinion

Quantum Corporation v. Rodime, Plc

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided November 27, 1995No. 94-1296PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLAGER, Circuit Judge.

The question in this declaratory judgment action is whether amendments made during a prior reexamination proceeding impermissi-bly broadened the scope of the patent claims at issue in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 305 (1988), 1 and, if so, the legal effect thereof. Defendant patentee Rodime PLC (Rodime) appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, Civil Action No. 4-93-214. In its decision, the district court granted Quantum Corporation’s (Quantum) motion for summary judgment that Claims 4, 6, 7, 9, 14 and 19-27 of U.S. Patent No. B1…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  2. Hybritech Incorporated v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Carroll Touch, Inc. v. Electro Mechanical Systems, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  4. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Phillips 66 Company, and Phillips Driscopipe, Inc., Defendants-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Seattle Box Company, Inc., D/B/A Seattle-Tacoma Box Company v. Industrial Crating & Packing, Inc., and James F. RennelsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Texas Digital Systems, Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Texas Instruments Incorporated v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Lsi Logic Corporation, and Vlsi Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  3. Digital Biometrics, Inc. v. Identix, Inc. And Randall C. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  4. Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Karlin Technology Inc. And Sofamor Danek Group, Inc. v. Surgical Dynamics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API