Legal Opinion

Tzystuck v. Chicago Transit Authority

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1988No. 65112, No. 65336PublishedCited by 140 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ward

The appeals in Nos. 65112 and 65336 were consolidated for purposes of oral argument and disposition of the issue of whether a treating physician who will testify to a medical opinion at trial is an expert witness within the meaning of Supreme Court Rule 220(b)(1) (107 Ill. 2d R. 220(b)(1)).

The plaintiff-appellee in case No. 65336, Elizabeth Diminskis, individually and as plenary guardian of the estate and person of Victor Diminskis, brought suit for personal injury against the defendants-appellants Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) and Harold D. Clemons following an incident in which a CTA bus…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. EmersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Dayan v. McDonald's Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. People v. LylesIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Bullard v. BarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People v. GarciaIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by140 opinions

  1. Turner v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Healy v. VaupelIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Holton v. Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Addison v. WhittenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Esser v. McIntyreIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API