Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Ford Motor Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 26, 1998No. 3:97CV7070PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order

CARR, District Judge.

This is a products liability case in which plaintiffs claim that their injuries resulted from defective deployment of an airbag manufactured by defendant. Because the parties are diverse, and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, this Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Pending is a motion by the defendant Ford Motor Company to compel three physicians who treated plaintiff Beverly Fisher for her injuries to appear for depositions at an hourly rate of $250 (Doc. 22). Defendant’s motion shall be granted, except that the physicians shall appear at…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Hurtado v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Morrison v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Patel v. GayesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Salas v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mohney v. USA Hockey, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
  2. Coleman v. DydulaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999
  3. Demar v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
  4. Wirtz v. Kansas Farm Bureau Services, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005
  5. Hawkins v. GracelandDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API