Legal Opinion
Schroeder v. Boeing Commercial Airplane Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 20, 1988No. Civ. A. No. 87-1220PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHEN, Senior District Judge:
This case comes to us on review from a decision by the Honorable Jerome B. Simandle, United States Magistrate, ordering certain fee limits for depositions taken by defendant, Boeing Commercial Airplane Company (“Boeing”), of five of plaintiff Teresa Schroeder’s treating physicians (as experts) and one of the experts retained for trial. Judge Simandle set the fees at what he believed to be a reasonable rate, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(4), with the result that Boeing paid a certain amount per hour for each of the witnesses and plaintiffs were left to pay…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sperling v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Environmental Tectonics Corp. v. W.s. Kirkpatrick & Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
- Sipes v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1986
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kresefky v. Panasonic Communications & Systems Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Dome Petroleum Ltd. v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of WisconsinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- Reed v. BinderDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Frank v. County of HudsonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Exxon Corp. v. Halcon Shipping Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.