Legal Opinion
Avid Identification Systems, Inc. v. Crystal Import Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 27, 2010No. 2009-1216, 2009-1254PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge PROST. Opinion concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge LINN.
PROST, Circuit Judge.
Avid Identification Systems Inc. (“Avid”) brought suit against Datamars SA and its subsidiary Crystal Import Corporation (collectively “Datamars”) alleging infringement of Avid’s U.S. Patent No. 5,235,326 (“the '326 patent”) directed to a multimode radio-frequency identification system for reading encoded biocompatible chips. The patent was found valid and infringed, but held to be unenforceable for inequitable conduct. This appeal challenges…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Exergen Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Fmc Corporation v. The Manitowoc Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Jeun v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Alston-Bullock v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Outdoor Venture Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Austin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Powell v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.