Legal Opinion

Universal Analytics, Inc. v. MacNeal-Schwendler Corp.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 2, 1989No. CV 87-06285 SVW(G)PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WILSON, District Judge.

The Order dated December 4, 1988 and filed December 6, 1988 is hereby amended as follows:

In footnote 5, the citation to United States v. Hernandez is updated to include the denial of certiorari and now reads United States v. Hernandez, 829 F.2d 988, 993 (10th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1486, 99 L.Ed.2d 714 (1988). In footnote 14, the typographical error in the citation to Albert Pick-Barth v. Mitchell Woodbury Cory, has been corrected. In all other respects the December 4, 1988 Order remains…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Imax Corporation v. Cinema Technologies, Inc. Neil JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Agency Solutions.Com, LLC v. Trizetto Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2011
  4. Basic American, Inc. v. ShatilaIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Advanced Modular Sputtering, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API