Legal Opinion

In Re PaineWebber Ltd. Partnerships Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 27, 1998No. 94 Civ. 8547(SHS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

STEIN, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is the Joint Fee Petition submitted by counsel for the plaintiff class (“Class Counsel”) in the above-captioned consolidated class action. Class Counsel’s efforts have resulted in the establishment of a $125,000,000 fund for the benefit of the Class, plus contingent “Additional Benefits,” which the parties have valued at $75,000,000. Class Counsel seeks a fee of 27.5% of the cash settlement fund, plus interest thereon from the date of the deposit of the funds, plus 27.5% of any monies ultimately paid as “Additional Benefits” to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation. (Appeal of Attorneys' Fee Awards)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  3. Paul, Johnson, Alston & Hunt v. GraultyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. Gottlieb v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re: Cendant Corporation Prides LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. Morris v. Affinity Health Plan, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. In Re American Bank Note Holographics, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  4. In Re BankAmerica Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2002
  5. In re Bausch & Lomb, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API