Legal Opinion
In re Bausch & Lomb, Inc. Securities Litigation
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided October 28, 1998No. 94-CV-6270LPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs commenced this securities fraud class action on June 6, 1994 against Bausch & Lomb, Inc. (“B & L”) and five individuals, all of whom are or were officers of B & L. The gist of plaintiffs’ claims was that defendants had for some time artificially inflated B & L’s stock price by concealing from the public certain financial problems that it was undergoing, and that when the truth was finally revealed, B & L’s stock price dropped, causing investors to lose money.
After the complaint had been .amended several times, defendants moved…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- In Re New Mexico Indirect Purchasers Microsoft Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re South Dakota Microsoft Antitrust LitigationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- In re Merrill Lynch Tyco Research Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Sabatini v. Corning-Painted Post Area School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.