Legal Opinion

Gottlieb v. Barry

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1994No. Nos. 93-1316, 93-1317, 93-1334, 93-1338, 93-1339, 93-1367, 93-1389, 93-1336 and 93-1337PublishedCited by 144 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

In these eight consolidated appeals, we address the propriety of the district court’s award of attorneys’ fees to some of the many lawyers who participated in the multitude of securities actions, and subsequent class action settlement, which followed the collapse of the MiniScribe Corporation, a publicly traded company which manufactured computer disk drives. At issue is what portion *481these attorneys may receive of a $44 million fund created by the settlement of Gottlieb v. Wiles, District Court No. 89-M-963, a class action certified on behalf of MiniSeribe…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by144 opinions

  1. Cook v. NiedertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Cheryl Reynolds v. Beneficial National Bank, Appeals of Belinda PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. Northington v. MarinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. Chieftain Royalty Co. v. Enervest Energy Institutional Fund XIII-A, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  5. Connolly v. Harris Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API