State v. Peden
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LOPEZ, Judge.
Defendant was charged with residential burglary pursuant to § 40A-16-3, N.M.S. A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6). The state introduced undisputed evidence that defendant had entered a dwelling without authorization and aided in removing a television set therefrom. Throughout the trial defendant contended that he had no idea the television and other items removed were stolen. He merely thought he was helping a former employer, one Rita Blea, remove items belonging to her.
From an adverse judgment and sentence, defendant asserts the following contentions for reversal: (1) there was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. AtwoodNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. HinojosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
- State v. MadridNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. ClementsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. EasterwoodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BenavidezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. HermosilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. UrbanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. VallejosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. WilsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.