Legal Opinion
State v. Urban
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 5, 1974No. 1385PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Defendant appeals his convictions of robbery while armed with a deadly weapon and aggravated battery. Sections 40A-16-2 and 40A-3-5, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6). The 1973 amendment to § 40A-16-2, supra, is not applicable. The issues concern: (1) sufficiency of the evidence; (2) an instruction defining aggravated battery; and (3) the applicability of § 40A-29-3.1, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6).
Three masked men entered Gino’s Lounge about 1:30 a. m. They were armed; they wanted money. One of the men took Gino into the office portion of the building and attempted to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. GunzelmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. OchoaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. RodriguezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. PattenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. FernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. FernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. AdamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. NajarNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.