Legal Opinion
Norfolk Southern Ry. Co. v. Shulimson Bros. Co.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided March 19, 1998No. Civil 1:97CV284PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
THORNBURG, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiffs timely filed objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr. Pursuant to standing orders of designation and 28 U.S.C. § 636, this Court referred the motions to dismiss of Defendants Natalie Zeitlin, Jack Shulimson, Bernard Shulimson and Gina Hart to the Magistrate Judge for a recommendation as to disposition. For the reasons state below, the motions will be allowed.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
According to the complaint, Shulimson…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GuerraSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Nurad, Inc. v. William E. Hooper & Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. SchmokeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Morris v. Wachovia Securities, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Krane v. Capital One Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. v. Target Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Illinois v. Grigoleit Co.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2000
- French v. Chosin Few, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.