Legal Opinion
In re Automobile Antitrust Cases I and II
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 5, 2016No. A134913PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REARDON, J.
—In this coordinated proceeding, certain purchasers of new automobiles in California (plaintiffs) brought state law claims against a number of automobile manufacturers and dealer associations under the Cartwright Act (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 16720-16728) and the unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 17200-17210). Specifically, plaintiffs allege that defendant manufacturers and associations conspired to keep lower priced, yet virtually identical, new cars from being exported from Canada to the United States, thereby keeping new vehicle prices in California higher than…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Krolikowski v. San Diego City Employees' Ret. Sys., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Hass v. Rhodyco Prods., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Ayala v. Dawson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- McNair v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Morales-Simental v. Genentech, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.