Legal Opinion
Krolikowski v. San Diego City Employees' Ret. Sys.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided May 23, 2018No. D071119PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtIrion, J.
*504*543Appellants Vincent Krolikowski and Connie Van Putten (collectively appellants) are former employees of the City of San Diego (the City) and members of the San Diego City Employees' Retirement System (SDCERS) who receive monthly pension payments from SDCERS, the administrator of the City's pension plan. Krolikowski and Van Putten separately filed lawsuits against SDCERS after SDCERS discovered an error in calculating their monthly pension benefits and took action to recoup the past overpayments. In their now-consolidated lawsuits, Krolikowski and Van Putten assert causes of action for…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People ex rel. Becerra v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Ward v. Tilly's, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Summers v. Colette, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Assn. for L.A. Deputy Sheriffs v. County of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- City of Hesperia v. Lake Arrowhead Community Services Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2023
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.