Legal Opinion

Correll v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 5, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2025-1169Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KEVIN P. CORRELL, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25-1169 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Kevin P. Correll served as an engineer in the United States Navy while he also operated a private legal practice for patent and trademark services based in Rhode Island. In 2021, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) suspended Mr. Correll from practicing before the agency for five years for violating USPTO rules. Mr. Correll brought this lawsuit to challenge…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Continental Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Terri Wright v. Eugene & Agnes E. Meyer FoundationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
  4. The Wilderness Society v. BabbittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  5. Douglas v. Chariots for HireDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API