Legal Opinion
International Ass'n of Bridge Workers, Local 372 v. Sunesis Construction Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 31, 2009No. C-081022PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dinkelacker, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental & Reinforcing Iron Workers, Local 372, AFL-CIO (“Local 372”), filed a complaint against defendant-appellee, Sunesis Construction Company, alleging that Sunesis had violated the prevailing-wage law on the Elliott Avenue Bridge Replacement Project. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Sunesis, holding, among other things, that Local 372 was not an interested party that could have brought the action.
{¶ 2} Local 372 has filed a timely appeal from that judgment. Because we hold…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Ohio Pyro, Inc. v. Ohio Department of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Pipe Fitters Union Local No. 392 v. Kokosing Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n, Local Union No. 33 v. Gene's Refrigeration, Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
- Stinespring v. Natorp Garden Stores, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chiquita Brands Internatl., Inc. v. Fed. Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Ohio Valley Associated Builders & Contractors v. Industrial Power Systems, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Ohio Valley Associated Builders & Contractors v. Rapier Electric, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Ohio Valley Associated Builders & Contractors v. KuempelOhio Court of Appeals · 2011