Pipe Fitters Union Local No. 392 v. Kokosing Construction Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
Appellants Kokosing and Laborers 265 argue, inter alia, that, in purportedly determining the respective rights and responsibilities of the parties pursuant to R.C. Chapter 4115 (“prevailing wage law”), the court of appeals effectively resolved a labor jurisdictional dispute, thereby exceeding the authority established by the Ohio prevailing wage laws. We hold in favor of the appellants, although our reasoning differs from that of the court of appeals. The court of appeals erred in this case not because the courts of this state are preempted from interpreting R.C. Chapter 4115, an issue we do…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- National Labor Relations Board v. Radio & Television Broadcast Engineers Union, Local 1212Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- City of Hubbard ex rel. Creed v. SaulineOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. National City Bank v. Board of Education of Cleveland City School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Robert Reich, Secretary of Labor v. Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State ex rel. Baker v. State Personnel Board of ReviewOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Love Properties, Inc v. Kyles, 2006 Ca 00101 (4-23-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Pipe Fitters Union Local No. 392 v. Kokosing Constr. Co., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. AWMS Water Solutions, L.L.C. v. MertzOhio Supreme Court · 2024
- Crum & Forster Indemnity Co. v. Ameritemps, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.