Legal Opinion
Ayres v. Cook
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 22, 1942No. 28807PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The defendant, William E. Cook, maintains that the judgment of the Court of Appeals adjudging specific performance of the contract to leave real property by will is prejudicially erroneous and should be reversed. The various alleged grounds of •error will be discussed in logical order.
It is contended that the contract for the sale of the undertaking business, which is in writing, could not be supplemented by showing a contemporaneous •oral agreement to devise real property by will.
It has been suggested that the doctrine of partial integration applies here and it certainly would as to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pearsall v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Frate v. RimenikOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Smith v. NyburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re: Marilyn E. Morris, Debtor. John Poss v. Marilyn E. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- McCarthy, Lebit, Crystal & Haiman Co. v. First Union Management, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Leach v. Akron General Medical CenterSummit County Court of Common Pleas · 1980
- 23 Tracts of Land v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
- In the Interest of L.R.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.