Legal Opinion
23 Tracts of Land v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 2, 1949No. 10849PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Circuit Judge.
These proceedings were instituted in the District Court by the United States to condemn perpetual easement to flood 23 tracts of land in connection with the construction and maintenance of certain dams and reservoirs in the Muskingum River Valley as part of a flood control project for the Ohio River Basin. The appellant, C. A. Basquin, who was a lessee of one of the tracts involved with an oral option to ptirchase, filed an answer claiming the right as the owner of that tract to defend the action. The District Judge sustained the Government’s contention that the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Goodman v. NiblackSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Joseph Chacon, Jr. v. Sam Granata, and Randolph Air Force BaseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- County of San Diego v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- CHKRS, LLC v. City of Dublin, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.