Legal Opinion
Rubel v. Peckham
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 29, 1949No. Civ. 7606PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment ordering them to specifically perform an agreement relating to the sale of certain real property owned by them in Tuba County. In addition, the judgment awarded damages to the plaintiff Rubel for his loss of use of the land by reason of defendants’ failure to convey and allowed the plaintiff Hall a real estate broker’s commission for his services in connection with the transaction.
The agreement which formed the basis of plaintiffs’ complaint was entered into by the defendants and Hall and among other things provided that defendants would…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Grimes v. NicholsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Sprigg v. BarberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. Co. v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Schroeder v. MauzyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Polster, Inc. v. SwingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Nanny v. Ruby Lighting Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Anderson v. County of San JoaquinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Buckmaster v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Bishel v. FariaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.