Legal Opinion

Bishel v. Faria

California Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1959No. Sac. 7042PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

This is an action to adjudicate the common boundary line of properties which adjoin in the middle of the San Joaquin River, and to quiet the plaintiffs’ title in and to the whole of a so-called island. The issues presented are, where is the middle of the river located as a matter of law and does the evidence support the trial court’s finding as to the location of the boundary line.

The plaintiffs’ property is situate in Madera County on the north side of the river. The defendant’s property is situate in Fresno County on the opposite or south side of the river. The river flows in a general…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Miller & Lux v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Herminghaus v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Missouri v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Buttenuth v. St. Louis Bridge Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Micelli v. AndrusOregon Supreme Court · 1912

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Belmont v. Umpqua Sand & Gravel, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Gibson v. CobbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. County of Lake v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API