Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Berkey
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Orange Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDailey, J.
This case rests substantially on the following facts:
The appellee’s intestate, Hays, was in appellant’s employ as a brakeman. On the 16th day of August, 1890, a train crew consisting of John Smith, engineer; a fireman, whose name is not furnished us; David Welch, conductor; Granville Hays and Melville Hays, brakemen, took a through freight train of appellant, at Bloomington, Indiana, to run it to New Albany. At the station of Harrodsburg, about twelve miles south of Bloomington, this train was laid out for three or four hours on .a siding, waiting, under orders, for other trains to pass.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SelbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. WynantIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Indianapolis, Pittsburg, & Cleveland Railroad v. Keely's AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. BowkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Jenney Electric Co. v. BranhamIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. HolcombIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Pennsylvania Co. v. McCaffreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Maxwell v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.