Legal Opinion

Cornell v. Sennes

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 15, 1971No. Civ. 36892PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHWEITZER, Acting P. J.

The principal questions involved on this appeal are (1) the right of a conditional vendor of air conditioning units, installed in a commercial building at the request of the tenant without the consent of the owners, to a mechanic’s lien against the realty for labor and materials, and (2), if the vendor is entitled to such lien, the effect thereon of his removal of the equipment, without the consent of the owners, after filing an action to establish and foreclose the lien.

Facts

In July 1967 defendants Frank Sennes and Mary Lou Sennes leased their restaurant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. R. D. Reeder Lathing Co. v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Nolte v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. R. Barcroft & Sons Co. v. CullenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Howard A. Deason & Co. v. Costa Tierra Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. E. K. Wood Lumber Co. v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Halbert's Lumber, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Fox v. Peck Iron and Metal Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1982
  3. Mora v. Baker Commodities, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Fondren v. K/L COMPLEX LTD.Nevada Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Dannemiller v. Amfac Distribution Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API