Legal Opinion

Dannemiller v. Amfac Distribution Corp.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1977No. 2895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., and RABI-NOWITZ, CONNOR and BURKE, JJ., and DIMOND, J. Pro Tem. DIMOND, Justice Pro Tem.

This case involves a claim of lien by AM-FAC against 34 modular units and against a leasehold estate of land in Valdez upon which the modular units are situated. The lien was asserted against appellants, Dan-nemiller, et al., who have the leasehold interest in the land and Labyrinth, Ltd., who owns the 34 modular units. The trial court found that AMFAC had a lien in the amount of $19,606.93 and that the 34 modular units and the leasehold estate were subject to the lien.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Day v. a & G Construction Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Peters v. Juneau-Douglas Girl Scout CouncilAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. A & G Const. Co., Inc. v. Reid Brothers Logging Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Timber Structures, Inc. v. C. W. S. Grinding & MacHine WorksOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Morrison v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nerox Power Systems, Inc. v. M-B Contracting Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. D.H. Blattner & Sons, Inc. v. N.M. Rothschild & Sons, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Fairbanks North Star Borough Assessor's Office v. Golden Heart Utilities, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Paul C. Helmick Corp. v. Lucky Chance Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API