Legal Opinion
Chula Vista City School District v. Bennett
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 20, 1987No. Appeal No. 86-1097PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARD S. SMITH, Circuit Judge.
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California held the $50 Rule, used by the Secretary of Education to evaluate applications for Impact Aid by local school districts, to be invalid as inconsistent with the legislative history of the Impact Aid statute. The district court granted summary judgment to cross-appellants and ordered the Secretary to process the applications using another method of evaluation. We reverse and remand.
Issues(1) Whether the district court erred in holding that the $50 Rule was inconsistent with the legislative…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Madison Galleries, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Stotts v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Secretary, Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services v. DembyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- District of Columbia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Kentucky ex rel. Cabinet for Human Resources v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.