Secretary, Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services v. Demby
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.
This matter has its origin in multiple decisions of the Inmate Grievance Office (“IGO”) dismissing the grievances of Quinton Demby, Jesse Baltimore, Kenneth E. Woodall, Daniel Falcone, and Earl F. Cox, Jr. All are, or were, 1 inmates serving sentences in the Division of Correction (“DOC”). In his respective grievance, each inmate alleged that amendments to the Code of Maryland Regulations (“COMAR”) adopted by the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services (“the Department”) were ex post facto laws, in violation of the United States Constitution and Article 17 of the Maryland…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bowen v. City of AnnapolisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Doe v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- John A. Ex Rel. A.A. v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Building Materials Corp. of America v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Town of La Plata v. Faison-Rosewick LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.