Legal Opinion

Green v. Castronova

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1966No. 4599PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law by defendant, appellant herein, from the order of the trial court granting plaintiff, appellee herein, a new trial. The jury had returned a verdict in favor of defendant. The trial judge sustained plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, because he found the verdict to be manifestly against the weight of the evidence.

The first question before this court is the standard we must use in reviewing this ease.

The case of Poske v. Mergl, 169 Ohio St. 70, holds as follows :

“1. Where the evidence in the trial of a case is such that the case must be submitted to a jury…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Denver Consolidated Electric Co. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  2. In Re Estate of HaydenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  3. Youngstown Municipal Ry. Co. v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Bahm v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Memphis St. Ry Co. v. CavellTennessee Supreme Court · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kennelly v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Cook v. SUNRISE HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Kinkey v. Jewish Hospital Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Mercer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Wild v. AlsterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API