Legal Opinion
Rosen v. Lawson-Hemphill, Inc.
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided August 6, 1975No. Civ. A. 5362PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETTINE, Chief Judge.
This is an action charging the defendant with infringement of United States Patent No. 3,648,939 granted March 14, 1972 for a “yarn storing device” 1 2 and seeks an injunction and an accounting. The defense is predicated on non-validity, non-infringement, and patent misuse.
Jurisdiction of the Court is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a).
Karl Isac Joel Rosen is a citizen of Sweden and the inventor of the patent in suit. AB Iro, co-owner of the patent, 3 is a manufacturing company located in Sweden engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling yarn feeding mechanisms…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jamesbury Corporation v. Litton Industrial Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Karl Isac Joel Rosen v. Lawson-Hemphill, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- International Society For Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. J. Roger BarberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Pacific Technica Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981