Legal Opinion
Loveladies Harbor, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 23, 1990No. 243-83LPublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Chief Judge.
This regulatory taking claim is before the court after a one-week trial, which followed the denial of cross-motions for summary judgment. After considering evidence presented at trial and having examined the site with the aid of counsel and expert witnesses, the court finds that the Army Corps of Engineers’ denial of a permit to fill plaintiff’s property resulted in a taking, and accordingly awards just compensation as mandated by the fifth amendment.
FACTS
The majority of the facts underlying this case previously were set forth in Loveladies Harbor, Inc. v. United…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Loveladies Harbor, Inc. And Loveladies Harbor, Unit D, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Loveladies Harbor, Inc. And Loveladies Harbor, Unit D, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Resource Investments, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Hage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Bowles v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.