Legal Opinion

Oregon Boiler Works v. Lott

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 26, 1992No. 89-23291, 89-14700, 89-14699, 89-14698, 89-12184, 89-14697; CA A68691PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Employer Oregon Boiler Works (OBW) seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding it responsible for claimant’s occupational disease claim. We affirm.

Claimant was discharged from the Army in 1970. At that time, he had suffered some hearing loss. In 1974, he began working as a boilermaker. He was working for OBW in March, 1983, when he sought medical treatment for his hearing loss, which had worsened since 1970. Thereafter, he occasionally wore a hearing aid in his right ear. He did not then make a claim against OBW. He worked for Combustion Engineering (CE) in 1987, for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Boise Cascade Corp. v. StarbuckOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Progress Quarries v. VaanderingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reynolds Metals v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. SAIF Corp. v. YokumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Baker v. Liberty Northwest InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. HagebushCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API