Legal Opinion

Progress Quarries v. Vaandering

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 2, 1986No. WCB 82-07420; WCB 82-09180; WCB 82-09204, WCB 82-10649; CA A33651PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

The issue in this workers’ compensation case is which of several employers is responsible for claimant’s occupational diseases of hearing loss and tinnitus. Claimant filed occupational disease claims against most of the employers for whom he had worked since 1975. It was conceded that both conditions were work related and that the issue was which employer was responsible for each condition. The referee concluded that petitioner Progress Quarries was responsible for the hearing loss and that respondent Todd Building, insured by SAIF, was responsible for the tinnitus. On review, the Workers’…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Boise Cascade Corp. v. StarbuckOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Matter of Compensation of GrableOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Smith v. Ed's Pancake HouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. Miville v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Silveira v. Larch EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. SAIF Corp. v. HenwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Poehlein v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. The New Portland Meadows v. DieringerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Oregon Boiler Works v. LottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API