Anton Lorenz and Irene Lorenz v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
WHITAKER, Judge.
This is a suit for refund of Federal income taxes. Plaintiff, Anton Lorenz, during the years with which we are concerned, was a professional inventor. In the joint return filed by him and his wife, Irene Lorenz, for 1952, there was reported, as ordinary income, receipts from the sale and assignment of patent rights. They claim they are taxable as capital gains, by reason of the passage of the Act of June 29, 1956 (70 Stat. 404), 26 U.S.C.A. § 117, subsequent, of course, to the filing of their return.
Defendant does not dispute that they are taxable as capital gains, but says…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Myers v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1946
- Barnett Hollander, of the Will of Lester Field, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Aaron Zacks and Florence Zacks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
- Verckler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
- Eastman Kodak Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. ZacksSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kellogg-Citizens National Bank of Green Bay, Wisconsin, of the Estate of Joseph B. Holzer, Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Harry B. Smith and Mary L. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Ambrose v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Green v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.