Legal Opinion

Ambrose v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 30, 1984No. 128-83TPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

OPINION

SETO, Judge.

In this action, plaintiff seeks a refund of federal individual income taxes for the calendar year 1976. Plaintiff contends that his signature was forged on a joint tax return filed by his estranged wife and on the refund check received therefrom. He now asserts that, despite the prior refund, he is entitled to a refund of the amount withheld for tax purposes from his salary during 1976.

Defendant, in lieu of an answer, filed a motion for summary judgment. Defendant contends that this court lacks jurisdiction in this case because…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. James B. Stanley v. Central Intelligence Agency United States Department of Defense U.S. ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. Kirby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  3. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  4. Anton Lorenz and Irene Lorenz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  5. Demo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Demes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  2. Rohmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  3. Rinaldi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. Haber v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API