Aaron Zacks and Florence Zacks v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
WHITAKER, Judge.
Plaintiffs sue for the recovery of an overpayment of income taxes by reason of having reported royalties received from patents as ordinary income. They allege that the amount paid was correctly computed according to the law, as interpreted by the rulings of the Internal Revenue Bureau, at the time it was paid, but that later Congress amended the Internal Revenue Code retroactively so as to provide that the amount received as royalties should be returned as capital gains rather than as ordinary income, which resulted in an overpayment.
The defendant interposes the defense that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Myers v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1946
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. HopkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- United States v. Eben H. Carruthers and Nancy CarruthersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Kronner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. ZacksSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kellogg-Citizens National Bank of Green Bay, Wisconsin, of the Estate of Joseph B. Holzer, Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Anton Lorenz and Irene Lorenz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
- Eastman Kodak Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
- Harry B. Smith and Mary L. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.