Harry B. Smith and Mary L. Smith v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal by the United States presents the issue as to whether the District Court erred in rendering judgment 1 for the taxpayer, Harry B. Smith, 2 in his suit for refund of income taxes paid for the years 1951 and 1952 on patent royalties which were treated as ordinary income pursuant to then current rulings of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
Taxpayer’s suit for refund was premised on the Act of June 29, 1956 (70 Stat. 404) which amended the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 by adding Section 117(q), 26 U.S.C. § 117(q) 3 which provided that royalties of the type…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kenneth J. Tobin and Marguerite R. Tobin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Aaron Zacks and Florence Zacks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
- Anton Lorenz and Irene Lorenz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
- United States v. George R. Dempster and Frances S. DempsterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Vaughn v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Canton v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1967
- WalterUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- CasterUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- ChurchUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- PuschelbergUnited States Court of Claims · 1962