Legal Opinion
Marco Supply Company, Inc. A Virginia Corporation v. At & T Communications, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 2, 1989No. 88-2612PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Per curiam
This case comes before us on appeal from the district court’s dismissal of the amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). In its complaint, the appellant Marco Supply Company (hereinafter “Marco”) had alleged that it had contracted with the appellee AT & T Communications, Inc. (hereinafter “AT & T”) for AT & T to install a computer-telephone network linking Marco’s offices located at different, distant locations. This contract was entered into by Marco based upon AT & T’S quotation to Marco, both orally and in writing, of what the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Aero Trucking, Inc. v. Regal Tube Company, and Third Party v. William Crum, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Company v. Golden Triangle Wholesale Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- F. Burkhart Mfg. Co. v. Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co. of Va. v. BlesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Fax Telecommunicaciones Inc. v. At&t, Michael Gilmartin and Richard StottsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Tenore v. AT&T Wireless ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Gelb v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Suzanne Cahnmann, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Sprint CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. New York City Human Resources AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.