F. Burkhart Mfg. Co. v. Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
This action was brought by the appellee railway company to recover from the appellant freight undercharges upon certain shipments of cotton from Lubbock, Texas, •to St. Louis, Missouri. The cotton was consigned by John B. Pruden, as shipper, to himself as consignee, under shipper’s order — notify bills of lading. The appellant was the party specified in the bills to be notified of the arrival of the shipments at St. Louis. The bills of lading were marked “prepaid.” The appellant had purchased the cotton from Pruden according to sample. The terms of sale were f.o.b. St.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Cmax, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Cmax, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Aero Trucking, Inc. v. Regal Tube Company, and Third Party v. William Crum, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Marco Supply Company, Inc. A Virginia Corporation v. At & T Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Southern Pacific Company, a Corporation of the State of Delaware v. Miller Abattoir Company, a Corporation of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.