Legal Opinion
United States Elevator Corp. v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 29, 1980No. 51805PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Vice Chief Justice.
The issue presented is whether the Public Competitive Bidding Act of 1974 (61 O.S. §§ 101 et seq.), insofar as it relates to the advertising, receiving bids and awarding public improvement contracts, applies to a “Home Rule” municipality which has charter provisions for competitive bidding on public improvement contracts. If the Act is applicable we must then determine if the contract involved here is within its terms.
We hold the Act is not applicable 1 and reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The City of Tulsa (City), a “Home Rule” city, followed its charter…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lackey v. State Ex Rel. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Sublett v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- City of Wewoka v. RodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Bodine v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- City of Muskogee v. SenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Oliver v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Homeowners for Fair Zoning v. City of TulsaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- Opinion No. (1989), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.