Legal Opinion

City of Muskogee v. Senter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 10, 1939No. 29034PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This case is presented on appeal from the district court of Muskogee county.

Error is urged in connection with a judgment therein rendered (without the intervention of a jury) on the 11th day of October, 1938, under which the city of Muskogee, Okla., was adjudged liable to Leon B. Senter for the principal sum of $9,614.71, together with accumulated interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum from the 1st day of January, 1938.

In the trial tribunal Leon B. Senter, who appears herein as defendant in error, was plaintiff and the city of Muskogee, plaintiff in error herein, was defendant.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caruth v. State Ex Rel. TobinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Hinz v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Blackledge v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Blumenauer v. Kaw CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. McKinney v. City of WagonerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nottingham v. City of YukonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Goodall v. City of ClintonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Lasiter v. City of MooreCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. EDWARDS v. CITY OF SALLISAWSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  5. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co. v. City of PurcellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API